Comparison of outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated COVID-19 kidney transplant recipients, a single center retrospective study-Is the taboo justified?

INTRODUCTION: We assessed differences in the post-transplant outcomes between COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated Kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 400 KTx from 2/1/2021 to 4/30/2022 with 6-21 months follow-up. Primary outcomes included differences in the incidence of post-transplant COVID-19, ICU admission for COVID-19, death, and graft failure between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were inpatient floor admission, outpatient-management, length of hospital stay during COVID-19 admission. We also reported rejection, DGF, CMV needing treatment, and BK PCR >10 000 in baseline characteristics. RESULT: 70.5% (282/400) were fully vaccinated, and 29.5% (118/400) were unvaccinated. 33% (92/282) of vaccinated and 39% (46/118) of unvaccinated patients developed COVID-19 (p-value .03). In both groups, 16% received outpatient treatments for COVID-19. 3% (12/282) of the vaccinated and 8% (11/118) unvaccinated were admitted to the general floors (p-value .06), and 1% (3/282) of the vaccinated and 3.3% (4/118) of the unvaccinated patients needed admission to the ICU (p-value .2). The length of stay was 12 days in both groups. 13/282 (4.6%) vaccinated patients and 7/118 (5.93%) unvaccinated patients died during the follow-up period (p-value = .3). COVID-19 was deemed the etiology of death in 5/13 cases in the vaccinated and 3/7 in the unvaccinated. DGF, rejection, CMV requiring treatment, and BK PCR >10 000 were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: The incidence of COVID-19 was higher in unvaccinated than in vaccinated KTx. The two groups were not statistically different for other primary outcomes, including the need for hospital admissions (outpatient, general floor, ICU), length of hospital stay, death, and graft failure.

A single-center review of outcomes between COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: With the availability of vaccines against SARS-COV-2, recommendations for vaccination of transplant candidates are widespread. At our institution, patients may receive liver transplant (LTx) regardless of vaccine status. The purpose of this study is to compare post-LTx outcomes between vaccinated (VAX) and unvaccinated (UNVAX) LTx recipients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study of LTx from January 1, 2021-March 30, 2022. The primary outcome is incidence of post-LTx COVID-19. Secondary outcomes include graft function, mortality, graft loss, and COVID-19 treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven LTx recipients were included, 57% [101/177] VAX and 43% [76/177] UNVAX. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 28 (36.8%) UNVAX and 34 (33.7%) VAX tested COVID-19 positive during the study period (p = .193) at a mean of 312.6 [255.4-369.8] days for UNVAX versus 254.6 [215.2-293.9] days for VAX (p = .084). COVID-19 treatment was administered in 15 (53.6%) of the UNVAX compared to 22 (64.7%) in the VAX (p = .374), although eight (28.6%) of UNVAX required hospital admission for treatment compared with two (5.9%) of VAX (p = .016). There were no statistically significant differences in death, and no COVID-19 related death or graft loss. There were no statistically significant differences in liver function tests at 3- and 12-months post LTx. CONCLUSION: In a series with a large percentage of UNVAX patients, LTx appears to be safe, with no difference in the rate of COVID-19 or transplant-related outcomes compared to VAX. While we encourage vaccination to prevent severe COVID, based on our results, vaccine status should not be reason to deny lifesaving transplant.

A Single-Center Case Series of Successful Abdominal Organ Transplantation From SARS-CoV-2-infected Donors to Uninfected Recipients-Do We Need Rigorous Monitoring?

There is limited documentation of hematogenous transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in non-lung transplants from infected donors to uninfected recipients. Methods: We analyzed 16 recipients (7 liver, 9 kidney) transplanted from SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test+ deceased donors from December 25, 2021, to February 28, 2022, who were followed-up for at least 90 d. Primary outcomes included coronavirus disease 2019-positivity, allograft loss, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included biopsy-proven rejection (BPAR), donor-specific antibodies, delayed graft function, and opportunistic infections. Unlike previous studies, we followed the recipients clinically with the intent to treat if they developed SARS-CoV-2 symptoms. Results: All donors were SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction-positive 72 h before donation. No recipients developed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The nadir serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 1.33 mg/dL and 64 mL/min/1.732 m2 for kidney transplantation (KTx) respectively. The median alanine transaminase was 14.5 IU/L, aspartate aminotransferase 13 IU/L, and alkaline phosphatase 74 IU/L. Two KTx patients lost allograft, and 1 liver transplantation patient died with a failed allograft. However, this was unrelated to their SARS-CoV-2-positive donor status. One BPAR in the liver transplantation was treated with steroids. No donor-specific antibodies or BPAR were reported in the KTx. Six KTx patients experienced delayed graft function, and 4 are off dialysis. Two KTx patients developed cytomegalovirus infection because of an error in reporting the cytomegalovirus serostatus by the donor center. We did not do serial testing for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction, imaging, or cycle threshold score pre- or posttransplant for donor/recipient and had comparable outcomes with previous studies. Conclusions: Because of the low risk of transmission, serial testing might not be necessary and, thus, could be reciprocated at small-volume transplant centers.

Kidney transplant from HCV viremic donors to HCV-negative recipients and risk for de novo donor specific antibodies and acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation from HCV-viremic donors into uninfected recipients is associated with excellent short-term outcomes. However, concerns regarding an increased risk for the development of de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA) and acute rejection have been raised in single center reports. METHODS: A retrospective study of HCV-negative kidney-only transplant recipients between 2018 and 2020. Patients were grouped based on the donor HCV status into group 1; HCV-viremic donors, and group 2; HCV-negative donors. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), with weights derived from the propensity score, were used to estimate the effect of donors' HCV-viremia on the recipients. The primary objective was to compare the 1-year incidence of de novo DSA. Secondary outcomes included group comparison of the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), 1-year patient and allograft survival, and 1-year renal allograft function. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included in the HCV NAT+ group, and 440 in the HCV- negative group. One-year incidence of de novo DSA was higher in the HCV NAT+ group in the IPTW weighted analysis (19% vs. 9%, p = .02). In the unweighted analysis, BPAR occurred in 7% of recipients in the HCV NAT+ group, compared to 3% in the control group (p = .06). However, due to the low event rate in the in the IPTW weighted groups, a statistical significance test could not be performed. Average estimated GFR was higher in the HCV-viremic group at 3 months (61 vs. 53 ml/min/1.73 m2 p = .002), but comparable at 6 (59 vs. 56 ml/min/1.73 m2 , p = .31) and 12 months (60 vs. 55 ml/min/1.73 m2 , p = .07). Patient and allograft survival were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Kidney transplant from HCV-viremic donors was associated with an increased risk for the development of post-transplant de novo DSA in the first year after transplantation, but no difference in patient and graft survival.

Survey of Salary and Job Satisfaction of Transplant Nephrologists in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no standardized benchmarks to measure productivity and compensation of transplant nephrologists in the United States, and consequently, criteria set for general nephrologists are often used. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A web-based survey was sent to 809 nephrologists who were members of the American Society of Transplantation to gather data on measures of productivity, compensation, and job satisfaction. Factors associated with higher total compensation and job satisfaction were examined. RESULTS: Of 365 respondents, 260 were actively practicing in the United States and provided data on compensation. Clinical productivity was assessed variably, and although 194 (76%) had their work relative value units (wRVUs) reported to them, only 107 (44%) had an established RVU target. Two hundred thirty-four respondents (90%) had fixed base compensation, and 172 (66%) received a bonus on the basis of clinical workload (68%), academic productivity (31%), service (32%), and/or teaching responsibility (31%). Only 127 respondents (49%) filled out time studies, and 92 (35%) received some compensation for nonbillable transplant activity. Mean total compensation (base salary and bonus) was $274,460±$91,509. The unadjusted mean total compensation was higher with older age and was higher for men; Hispanic and White respondents; adult care transplant nephrologists; residents of the western United States; US medical school graduates; nonuniversity hospital employees; and those with an administrative title, higher academic rank, and a higher number of years in practice. Two hundred and nine respondents (80%) thought their compensation was unfair, and 180 (70%) lacked a clear understanding of how they were compensated. One hundred forty-five respondents (55%) reported being satisfied or highly satisfied with their job. Job satisfaction was greater among those with higher amounts of compensation and US medical school graduates. CONCLUSIONS: We report significant heterogeneity in the assessment of productivity and compensation for transplant nephrologists and the association of compensation with job satisfaction.

Kidney transplant from hepatitis C viremic donors into aviremic recipients and risk for post-transplant BK and cytomegalovirus infection.

BACKGROUND: kidney transplantation from Hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors to uninfected recipients is associated with excellent short-term outcomes. However, HCV viremia might be associated with an increased risk for post-transplant viral complications. METHODS: We designed a retrospective study of HCV-negative kidney-only transplant recipients between 2018 and 2020. Recipients were grouped into group 1; HCV-negative donors, and group 2; HCV-viremic donors. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score. The primary objectives were to compare the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia ≥ 200 ml/IU, and BK viremia ≥1000 copies/ml between the groups. Secondary outcomes included group comparison of CMV disease, BK viremia ≥10 000 copies/ml, and 1-year patient and allograft survival. RESULTS: The study included 634 patients in group 1, and 71 patients in group 2. Sixty-five pairs of patients were matched. Incidence of CMV viremia (33.3% vs. 40.0%, p = .4675), and BK viremia (15.9% vs. 27.7%, p = .1353) did not differ significantly between groups in the matched cohort. Incidence of CMV disease (81.0% vs. 76.9%, p = 1.000), and BK viremia ≥10 000 copies/ml (9.5% vs. 16.9%, p = .2987) were comparable between groups. There was no difference in the 1-year patient or allograft survival between groups. CONCLUSION: kidney transplant from HCV-viremic donors is not associated with increased risk for BK or CMV viremia.

Insights into early postoperative acute kidney injury following lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after lung transplantation (LT) and is associated with higher cost and mortality. We sought to evaluate the incidence of postoperative AKI, defined as AKI within 14 days of transplant, and identify associated perioperative factors. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of 153 lung transplant recipients. Postoperative AKI was determined using the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage) criteria. Perioperative covariates and their association with postoperative AKI were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to evaluate patient survival at 1 year and data finalization. A sub-analysis was performed evaluating factors associated with early AKI (within 48 h of transplant) and late AKI. RESULTS: Postoperative AKI occurred in 36.6% of patients with 51.8% of cases occurring within 48 h of LT. Recipient race, transplant type, cardiopulmonary support, and red blood cell administration were associated with postoperative AKI. Survival was significantly lower in patients with postoperative AKI following LT. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative AKI within 2 weeks of lung transplant is associated with lower short- and long-term survival. Perioperative factors associated with postoperative AKI may be potential points of intervention to minimize AKI development in the future.

Looking Beyond the Allograft Survival: Long-Term, 5-Year Renal Outcome in Lung Transplant Recipients.

With the increased incidence and survival of lung transplant (LTx) recipients, the risk for chronic sequelae such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) is on the rise. Data on the long-term renal outcome are scarce. We performed a retrospective chart review of 171 adults with LTx from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2019. Primary outcomes were prevalence of CKD/end-stage renal disease, acute kidney injury (AKI) as a risk factor for future CKD, and all-cause mortality in recipients with CKD compared with the non-CKD group. Secondary outcomes were frequency of utilization of modalities for CKD (urinalysis, imaging, biopsy, nephrology consultations). Baseline median creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 0.8 mg/dL and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Of the participants, 60% (96 of 161), 67% (102 of 153), 79% (37 of 47), 86% (10 of 12) had CKD at the end of 6, 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively, and 16% were on dialysis at the end of the study period; 3% received a subsequent renal transplant, and 27% mortality was noted over a 5-year follow-up period. The odds of CKD development in patients with an AKI during index hospitalization vs no AKI was 6.22 (2.87 to 13.06, P < .0001). The odds ratio of all-cause mortality in patients with CKD compared with non-CKD was 3.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.44-8.64, P = .005). Measurement of hematuria/proteinuria, imaging, and renal biopsy were infrequently used. Given the high prevalence of AKI and CKD in this population, a multidisciplinary team approach with an early nephrology consultation will be key to improve the overall and renal outcomes in LTx recipients.

A review of kidney transplantation from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-negative recipients.

The safety and efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapies have allowed the transplantation of organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic donors into uninfected recipients. This novel strategy contrasts with the previous standard-of-care practice of limiting the transplantation of HCV infected-donor organs to HCV-infected recipients, or all too often, discarding viable organs. In this review, we summarize the published literature about the safety and feasibility of transplanting organs from HCV-viremic donors, the challenges that hinder wider adoption of this strategy, and future research needs.

A real-world, single-center experience of the utilization of hepatitis C-viremic kidneys for hepatitis C-negative recipients.

The advent of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies has allowed kidney transplantation from hepatitis C (HCV)-viremic donors into negative recipients. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of such practice when utilizing a patient's health plan to cover the cost for DAAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, pilot clinical study. 30 HCV-negative participants received kidney transplant from HCV-viremic deceased donors. HCV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was checked on day 3 post transplant, and a request for pan-genotypic DAA therapy was sent once viremia was confirmed. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients achieving sustained virologic response defined as undetectable HCV PCR 12 weeks after therapy completion, and the percentage of patients receiving DAAs via patient's health plan. RESULTS: HCV viremia occurred in all 30 recipients. Sustained viral response was achieved in 93% of the patients. Two patients failed first-line DAAs, 1 patient due to non-compliance with the prescribed regimen while the other due to NS5A mutation. DAA therapy was successfully obtained via patient's health plan in 28/30 patients. There was no significant liver-related complication, patient death, or graft loss. CONCLUSION: Kidney transplantation from HCV-viremic donors appears to be safe. However, challenges with obtaining DAA coverage in the United States persist.

Modification in induction immunosuppression regimens to safely perform kidney transplants amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted organ donation and transplantation across the globe. METHODS: This study analyzed transplant outcomes during the pre-pandemic [PPE, 1/2019-2/2020] and pandemic era [PE, 3/2020-8/2020] based on changes in induction immunosuppression. During PPE, high immunological risk patients received 4-6 mg/kg, moderate risk 2-4 mg/kg, and low risk 1-2 mg/kg of ATG. During PE, ATG doses were reduced to 3-4 mg/kg for high risk, 1-2 mg/kg for moderate, and low changed to basiliximab. Primary outcomes are as follows: biopsy-proven rejection [BPAR], de-novo donor-specific antibody [DSA], delayed graft function [DGF], infection rates, graft loss, and all-cause of mortality. RESULTS: During PPE, 224 kidney transplants [KTx] and 14 kidney/pancreas transplants [KP] were included, while 180 KTx and 5 KP were included for PE. Basiliximab use increased by 30% in the PE. The odds of DGF were statistically significant between PE vs PPE, OR 1.7 [1.05, 2.8, p-value = .042]. The odds of developing DSAs and BPAR during the PE vs. PPE were 0.34 [0.16, 0.71, p-value = .004] and OR 0.34 (0.1 to 1.1, p-value, .104)], respectively. Cytomegalovirus [19% in PE, 37% in PPE] and BK virus [5.4% PE vs. 16% PPE] incidence reduced during PE vs. PPE. COVID-19, graft loss, and mortality were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: KTx and KP transplants were performed safely during the COVID-19 pandemic with a reduction of induction immunosuppression.

Transplant administration-A survey of the roles and responsibilities of kidney and pancreas medical directors of US transplant centers.

The current American Society of Transplantation (AST) accredited transplant fellowship programs in the United States provide no structured formal training in leadership and administration which is essential for successfully running a transplant program. We conducted a survey of medical directors of active adult kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant programs in the United States about their demographics, training pathways, and roles and responsibilities. The survey was emailed to 183 medical directors, and 123 (67.2%) completed the survey. A majority of respondents were older than 50 years (61%), males (80%), and holding that position for more than 10 years (47%). Only 51% of current medical directors had taken that position after completing a one-year transplant fellowship, and 58% took on the role with no prior administrative or leadership experience. The medical directors reported spending a median 50%-75% of time in clinical responsibilities, 25%-50% of time in administration, and 0%-25% time in research. The survey also captured various administrative roles of medical directors vis-à-vis other transplant leaders. The study, designed to be the starting point of an improvement initiative of the AST, provided important insight into the demographics, training pathways, roles and responsibilities, job satisfaction, education needs, and training gaps of current medical directors.

Early Posttransplant Blood Transfusion and Risk for Worse Graft Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Blood transfusion is a risk factor for allosensitization. Nevertheless, blood transfusion posttransplant remains a common practice. We evaluated the effect of posttransplant blood transfusion on graft outcomes. METHODS: We included nonsensitized, first-time, kidney-alone recipients transplanted between 1 July 2015 and 31 December 2017. Patients were grouped based on receiving blood transfusion in the first 30 days posttransplant. The primary end point was a composite outcome of biopsy-proven acute rejection, death of any cause, or graft failure in the first year posttransplant. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome and the cumulative incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three patients were included. One hundred twenty-seven (47%) received blood transfusion. Patients in the transfusion group were more likely to be older, have had a deceased donor, and have received induction with basiliximab. There was no difference between groups in the composite primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio = [HR] 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-2.17; P = 0.23). The cumulative incidence of de novo DSAs during the first year posttransplant was similar between groups (12.8% transfusion vs. 10.9% no transfusion, P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: Early transfusion of blood products in kidney transplant recipients receiving induction with lymphocyte depletion was not associated with an increased hazard of experiencing acute rejection, death from any cause, or graft loss.

Outcomes of hepatitis C virus seropositive donors to hepatitis C virus seronegative liver recipients: A large single center analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The success of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has transformed the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and has led to the expansion of the deceased donor organ pool for liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a single center retrospective review of liver transplantations performed on HCV-seronegative recipients from HCV-seropositive organs from 11/2017 to 05/2020. HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was performed on HCV-seropositive donors to assess active HCV infection. RESULTS: 42 HCV-seronegative recipients underwent a liver transplant from a HCV-seropositive donor, including 21 NAT negative (20 liver, 1 simultaneous liver kidney transplant) and 21 NAT positive liver transplants. Two (9.5%) HCV antibody positive/NAT negative recipients developed HCV viremia and achieved sustained virologic response with DAA therapy. The remaining patients with available data (19 patients) remained polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative at 6 months. 20 (95%) of HCV antibody positive/NAT positive recipients had a confirmed HCV viremia. 100% of patients with available data (15 patients) achieved SVR. Observed events include 1 mortality and graft loss and equivalent rates of post-transplant complications between NAT positive and NAT negative recipients. CONCLUSIONS: HCV-seropositive organs can be safely transplanted into HCV-seronegative patients with minimal complications post-transplant.

Antithymocyte induction dosing and incidence of opportunistic viral infections using steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is limited literature evaluating rATG induction dosing and incidence of opportunistic viral infections when using steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, study compared high rATG (>4.5 mg/kg) versus low (<4.5 mg/kg) induction dosing and the overall incidence of early opportunistic viral infection at 180 days in the setting of maintenance immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, rapid steroid withdrawal, and a tiered antiviral prevention strategy based on donor-recipient Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were included; 76 patients received low-dose and 133 patients received high-dose rATG. Incidence of overall opportunistic viral infection occurred more frequently in patients who received high compared to low dose (29.8% vs 25% p = .030). Incidence of CMV infection was also significantly increased in the high-dose group (31.6% vs 18.4% p = .039). In a multivariable model, rATG dose, as a continuous variable, remained a significant independent predictor of infection along with CMV risk (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.09) controlling for age and CMV risk. There were no differences in graft-related outcomes at 180 days. CONCLUSION: Higher cumulative rATG induction dose was associated with increased incidence of opportunistic viral infections, in the setting of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in the early post-transplant period.

Defining the roles and responsibilities of the kidney transplant medical director: A necessary step for future training, mentoring, and professional development.

The management of a kidney transplant program has evolved significantly in the last decades to become a highly specialized, multidisciplinary standard of care for end-stage kidney disease. Transplant center job descriptions have similarly morphed with increasing responsibilities to address a more complex patient mix, increasing medical and surgical therapeutic options, and increasing regulatory burden in the face of an ever-increasing organ shortage. Within this evolution, the role of the Kidney Transplant Medical Director (KTMD) has expanded beyond the basic requirements described in the United Network for Organ Sharing bylaws. Without a clear job description, transplant nephrology trainees may be inadequately trained and practicing transplant nephrologists may face opaque expectations for the roles and responsibilities of Medical Director. To address this gap and clarify the key areas in which the KTMD interfaces with the kidney transplant program, American Society of Transplantation (AST) formed a Task Force of 14 AST KTMDs to review and define the role of the KTMD in key aspects of administrative, regulatory, budgetary, and educational oversight of a kidney transplant program.

Largest Experience of Safety and Efficacy of Patiromer in Solid Organ Transplant.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.